Who Gives Me Better Than Receive?
The idea is that rich people believe that their self-worth (worthy), and heirs
of wealth, while the poor scared and feel unworthy (unworthy) so they are not
entitled to receive the property.
For example, the poor when they actually hailed sincerely feel worthless. They
also do not dare to set a high price for what they provide, even if what they
do indeed deserve a premium price.
However, further Harv said that the statement "giving better than
receiving" is a false statement that was created by those who wish to have
more people who give and those who receive.
Of course I disagree. And I strongly disagree with the above statement
because by applying the above statement then make sure you will never have the
properties and help each other help would be fatal in the hearts of the future,
because I think we'll get something from the creator then we member must
do something to others.
What you give determines what are you going to get well in your future life.
I agree with Jim Rohn. He said that "giving is better than receiving
because giving will start the process of receiving."
It is better not to say that one could exist without the other. Both,
giving and receiving, are equally good. But I think we can not accept it
if we do not give.
as if according to the ancient concept of yin and china are on the form of
balance if there is any member that receives the aka.Because they can not run
if only one one for giving and receiving is a balance that bias only run if
they do it in
.
It could have been beggars continue to receive the money even though they never
give anything, but as said Anzia Yezierka (author of Poland), poverty can be
described as a bag with holes. Despite continued to receive, the money
will fall by the wayside.
"Giving is better than receiving Because giving starts the receiving
process." - Jim Rohn
My advice do activities with the member as a member then you will get it.
0 komentar:
Post a Comment